A workshop was convened at NOAA's Pacific Fisheries Environmental Group in Pacific Grove, California, on 16-18 July 1996, to examine the uses of environmental data for fisheries. The objectives of the workshop were to i) assess the current and future needs for environmental data bases (oceanographic, atmospheric, remote sensing, model output, and geological) in fisheries research and management, ii) identify data sources and formats, and iii) recommend ways to facilitate access to the data. The workshop brought together fisheries scientists, physical scientists, and environmental data specialists to address the following kinds of questions:
This background information provided an ideal backdrop for further
discussions and generation of ideas. Five working groups convened
during the workshop to address:
Develop baseline time series of the most important parameters: The two highest priority recommendations apply across real-time and retrospective working groups and point out the importance of i) developing the baseline against which perturbations are evaluated for both real time and retrospective aspects of environmental data use and ii) the importance of extending time series of important parameters back in time to evaluate resource fluctuations. These important parameters include ocean and atmospheric data, resource fluctuation data, and integrative time series that may include model output or proxy time series.
Apply new environmental data technologies to fisheries problems: New and emerging technologies have the potential to change the way in which environmental data are applied to fisheries. These techniques, however, require further evaluation and demonstration projects to convince fisheries scientists and managers of their utility. Remote sensing, multi-beam sonar, numerical models, and other techniques are expanding more rapidly than the fisheries community can assimilate them into practical applications for research and management.
Communication and sharing of expertise among disciplines and agencies: Fisheries research and management agencies are under pressure to conduct surveys, produce stock assessments, and conserve resources and habitats with often inadequate staffing. The levels of expertise required to incorporate the new technology into fisheries may need to come from other line offices of NOAA, from other agencies, and from the academic community. Mechanisms should be developed which will promote such communication and collaboration to solve high priority problems, including rotational assignments across agency boundaries and directed funding initiatives.
Demonstration of the benefits of applied environmental data in fisheries: Projects demonstrating how environmental data, model output, or new environmental technologies can be applied to marine fisheries are required in order to promote their future use in the community. Past examples of crises in fisheries exist where environmental data or model output are available. In a retrospective fashion, the scientific community should be able to show how prudent use of these environmental data could have helped understand or predict the situation, thereby assisting in management decisions.
Data accessibility for fisheries scientists: Fisheries scientists and
managers are not always able to readily access the data required to do their
jobs and to develop new, innovative approaches. More appropriate data bases
and integrative time series, available on-line and in near real-time, must be developed.
George Boehlert, NOAA NMFS, Southwest Fisheries Science Center,
Pacific Fisheries Environmental Group, 1352 Lighthouse Avenue,
Pacific Grove, CA 93950-2097
(gboehlert@pfeg.noaa.gov).
Jim Schumacher, NOAA OAR, Pacific Marine Environmental Lab,
7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115-0070 (jdschu@pmel.noaa.gov).
For further information, contact the convenors: